Medical Marijuana
by Jack Tourette
04 June 1998
The editorial in Thursday's Orlando Sentinel ("Snuff out pot petition")
is sadly misguided. It's disingenuous to claim there is no scientific
evidence of medical marijuana's effectiveness and safety; the government
agencies responsible for approving such studies refuse to do so.
According to the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
(MAPS), Dr. Donald Abrams, UC San Francisco, is the only researcher in
the United States currently approved to study the medical use of smoked
marijuana in a patient population. It took Abrams five and a half years
to obtain FDA approval of his study, "Short Term Effects of Cannabinoids
in HIV Patients," the first such research the FDA has approved in fifteen
years. (The study was scheduled to begin last month.)
Government agencies deliberately hinder drug-related research. At one
point, the NIDA, the only legal source of marijuana in the U.S., refused
to supply marijuana to Dr. Abrams' initial protocol, despite FDA-approval!
Not many researchers have the fortitude or the funding to spend more than
five years trying to get a two-year study approved.
Another researcher, Dr. Ethan Russo, University of Montana, recently had
his MAPS-supported NIH grant application ("Cannabis in Acute Migraine
Treatment Project") rejected. Many of the NIH criticisms were contradictory;
others called for "elements that the protocol in fact already contained,"
according to Russo's report in the Spring 1998 MAPS newsletter
(www.maps.org/news-letters). Let's hope he has Dr. Abrams' persistence.
The political machinations that prevent development of safer and more
effective weapons for the "battery of medications" show gross disregard
for the patients who have trouble finding effective medication in the
current arsenal. It is inhumane to deny them access to new, possibly
more effective treatments. Some of these people aren't fighting for
"their right to party" - they're fighting for their health, and in some
cases, for their lives.
The reason medical marijuana proponents "talk as though only marijuana can
treat pain, ease nausea or stimulate appetite" is that marijuana frequently
is more effective than pharmaceutical drugs, and safer and cheaper as well.
Home-grown marijuana is essentially free. Smoked marijuana acts quickly,
so users easily self-titrate their doses to decrease side-effects; this is
not possible with oral dronabinol (pharmaceutical THC). Even the high-THC
marijuana that anti-drug factions consider dangerous is actually healthier
than weaker marijuana because less smoke is required to get an effect.
The petition is no Trojan Horse filled with invading soldiers; it is our
friends and family members expressing their compassion for the collateral
casualties of the War on Drugs.
|